On the other hand, in a bet, neither party is likely to lose, except for what is created by the agreement itself.  Whether an agreement is competitive depends on the content and not the terms of the agreement.  The very object of the parties must be discovered. In the case of Moore v. Elphick (1945) found that wherever skill plays an important role in the outcome of the competition and results are awarded on the merits of the solution, it is not a lottery and therefore a bet. There is no answer to an action by the broker with respect to such a claim against its principle that; For the defendant, he entered into the contract as a bet with the intention of paying only the differences; and that the plaintiff must have known of the defendant`s inability to enter into the contracts through payments and deliveries, given his position and means. In the event of the cancellation of the contract which forms the basis of the appeal, the Tribunal has the power to reject the application despite the defendant`s confession.  A and B will enter into an agreement which, if A leaves his job, will pay B 500 Rs. to A and A 500 Rs. to B if he does not leave his job. Here, A controls the event. Therefore, no bet.
A crossword was given in a newspaper and it was said in the newspaper that their resolution of the crossword puzzles would match the solution with the editor, he would receive the first prize. It is a game of chance and therefore a lottery. It`s a gamble. Address contests are not called bets, because winning such events requires a considerable amount of skill and does not depend on the probability of an uncertain event. For example, crossword puzzles, sports competitions, etc. But if the competition is based on chance and not on a lottery, it would be a gamble and therefore zero. 3. In a betting agreement, neither party has an interest in an event occurring or not happening. But in an insurance contract, both parties are interested in the object. An interesting interpretation of this case was that, although all illegal agreements are nullified and unenforceable, not all non-legal agreements are illegal or immoral or contrary to public order.
Although all betting agreements are null and private and are not yet applicable in a betting agreement, it is therefore important to verify whether such an agreement is also illegal under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, in order to verify its legality. Another element of the betting agreement is that each party should win or lose depending on the uncertain event. As far as guarantees are concerned, betting agreements are non-friendly, but they are not illegal, they are not agreeable.